You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Developing global health technology standards: what can other industries teach us?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Globalization and Health, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1744-8603-9-49 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hassan Masum, Rebecca Lackman, Karen Bartleson |
| Abstract |
There is a lack of effective and affordable technologies to address health needs in the developing world. One way to address problems of innovation and affordability is to design global health technologies to follow agreed-upon standards. This Debate article argues that we can better develop standards for global health technologies if we learn lessons from other industries. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 42% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 21% |
| Myanmar | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 37% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Researcher | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 23 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 11% |
| Engineering | 8 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 21% |
| Unknown | 28 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2014.
All research outputs
#2,713,136
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#450
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,507
of 224,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.