↓ Skip to main content

Targeted sampling of cementum for recovery of nuclear DNA from human teeth and the impact of common decontamination measures

Overview of attention for article published in Investigative Genetics, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Targeted sampling of cementum for recovery of nuclear DNA from human teeth and the impact of common decontamination measures
Published in
Investigative Genetics, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/2041-2223-4-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Denice Higgins, John Kaidonis, Grant Townsend, Toby Hughes, Jeremy J Austin

Abstract

Teeth are a valuable source of DNA for identification of fragmented and degraded human remains. While the value of dental pulp as a source of DNA is well established, the quantity and presentation of DNA in the hard dental tissues has not been extensively studied. Without this knowledge common decontamination, sampling and DNA extraction techniques may be suboptimal. Targeted sampling of specific dental tissues could maximise DNA profiling success, while minimising the need for laborious sampling protocols and DNA extraction techniques, thus improving workflows and efficiencies. We aimed to determine the location of cellular DNA in non-degraded human teeth to quantify the yield of nuclear DNA from cementum, the most accessible and easily sampled dental tissue, and to investigate the effect of a common decontamination method, treatment with sodium hypochlorite (bleach).We examined teeth histologically and subsequently quantified the yield of nuclear DNA from the cementum of 66 human third molar teeth. We also explored the effects of bleach (at varying concentrations and exposure times) on nuclear DNA within teeth, using histological and quantitative PCR methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 20%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 27 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 12%
Arts and Humanities 6 6%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 29 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2023.
All research outputs
#6,332,572
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Investigative Genetics
#61
of 94 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,511
of 224,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Investigative Genetics
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.