↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: The effects of probiotics on depressive symptoms in humans: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of General Psychiatry, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: The effects of probiotics on depressive symptoms in humans: a systematic review
Published in
Annals of General Psychiatry, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12991-017-0141-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline J. K. Wallace, Roumen Milev

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s12991-017-0138-2.].

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 19%
Researcher 3 14%
Unspecified 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 6 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 14%
Psychology 3 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 7 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2019.
All research outputs
#2,560,291
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Annals of General Psychiatry
#67
of 513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,658
of 307,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of General Psychiatry
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.