You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
INCITE: A randomised trial comparing constraint induced movement therapy and bimanual training in children with congenital hemiplegia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neurology, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2377-10-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roslyn Boyd, Leanne Sakzewski, Jenny Ziviani, David F Abbott, Radwa Badawy, Rose Gilmore, Kerry Provan, Jacques-Donald Tournier, Richard AL Macdonell, Graeme D Jackson |
| Abstract |
Congenital hemiplegia is the most common form of cerebral palsy (CP) accounting for 1 in 1300 live births. These children have limitations in capacity to use the impaired upper limb and bimanual coordination deficits which impact on daily activities and participation in home, school and community life. There are currently two diverse intensive therapy approaches. Traditional therapy has adopted a bimanual approach (BIM training) and recently, constraint induced movement therapy (CIMT) has emerged as a promising unimanual approach. Uncertainty remains about the efficacy of these interventions and characteristics of best responders. This study aims to compare the efficacy of CIMT to BIM training to improve outcomes across the ICF for school children with congenital hemiplegia. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 345 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 59 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 12% |
| Researcher | 32 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 67 | 19% |
| Unknown | 75 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 101 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 26 | 7% |
| Psychology | 22 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 52 | 15% |
| Unknown | 90 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2013.
All research outputs
#20,207,295
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#2,131
of 2,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,573
of 164,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.