↓ Skip to main content

Primary prevention of overweight in preschool children, the BeeBOFT study (breastfeeding, breakfast daily, outside playing, few sweet drinks, less TV viewing): design of a cluster randomized…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
349 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Primary prevention of overweight in preschool children, the BeeBOFT study (breastfeeding, breakfast daily, outside playing, few sweet drinks, less TV viewing): design of a cluster randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-974
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hein Raat, Mirjam K Struijk, Teun Remmers, Eline Vlasblom, Amy van Grieken, Suzanne ML Broeren, Saskia J te Velde, Maaike Beltman, Magda M Boere-Boonekamp, Monique P L’Hoir

Abstract

Two overweight prevention interventions were developed to be offered by preventive Youth Health Care (YHC) in addition to the currently applied overweight prevention protocol to parents of 0-3 year old children. The two interventions aim to support parents of preschool children to realize healthy child nutrition and activity behaviors of their young child. The aim of this study is to assess the effects of the two overweight prevention interventions with regard to child health behaviors and child Body Mass Index.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 349 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 18%
Student > Bachelor 41 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 10%
Researcher 33 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Other 47 13%
Unknown 110 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 64 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 51 15%
Psychology 25 7%
Sports and Recreations 19 5%
Social Sciences 18 5%
Other 48 14%
Unknown 124 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2014.
All research outputs
#3,554,136
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,857
of 14,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,458
of 211,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#83
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,807 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.