You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The association between family and community social capital and health risk behaviours in young people: an integrative review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-971 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kerri E McPherson, Susan Kerr, Antony Morgan, Elizabeth McGee, Francine M Cheater, Jennifer McLean, James Egan |
| Abstract |
Health risk behaviours known to result in poorer outcomes in adulthood are generally established in late childhood and adolescence. These 'risky' behaviours include smoking, alcohol and illicit drug use and sexual risk taking. While the role of social capital in the establishment of health risk behaviours in young people has been explored, to date, no attempt has been made to consolidate the evidence in the form of a review. Thus, this integrative review was undertaken to identify and synthesise research findings on the role and impact of family and community social capital on health risk behaviours in young people and provide a consolidated evidence base to inform multi-sectorial policy and practice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 50% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 33% |
| Scientists | 3 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 244 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 13% |
| Researcher | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 45 | 18% |
| Unknown | 69 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 39 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 10% |
| Psychology | 24 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 88 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2013.
All research outputs
#2,624,381
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,000
of 14,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,440
of 211,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#66
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,807 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.