You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparing two sampling methods to engage hard-to-reach communities in research priority setting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-016-0242-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melissa A. Valerio, Natalia Rodriguez, Paula Winkler, Jaime Lopez, Meagen Dennison, Yuanyuan Liang, Barbara J. Turner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 60% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Mexico | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 468 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 467 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 76 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 70 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 10% |
| Researcher | 30 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 6% |
| Other | 74 | 16% |
| Unknown | 144 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 51 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 45 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 9% |
| Psychology | 21 | 4% |
| Other | 95 | 20% |
| Unknown | 164 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2023.
All research outputs
#8,827,916
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,288
of 2,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,387
of 325,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#18
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.