You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Performance enhancement with supplements: incongruence between rationale and practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1550-2783-4-19 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Petróczi, Declan P Naughton, Jason Mazanov, Allison Holloway, Jerry Bingham |
| Abstract |
Athletes are expected to consider multiple factors when making informed decision about nutritional supplement use. Besides rules, regulations and potential health hazards, the efficacy of different nutritional supplements in performance enhancement is a key issue. The aim of this paper was to find evidence for informed decision making by investigating the relationship between specific performance-related reasons for supplement use and the reported use of nutritional supplements. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 38% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | 8% |
| Chile | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 29 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2014.
All research outputs
#1,606,284
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#368
of 882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,500
of 437,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#359
of 854 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 854 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.