↓ Skip to main content

Developing the draft descriptive system for the child amblyopia treatment questionnaire (CAT-Qol): a mixed methods study

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing the draft descriptive system for the child amblyopia treatment questionnaire (CAT-Qol): a mixed methods study
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-11-174
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jill Carlton

Abstract

Amblyopia is a visual condition that occurs in childhood. Screening programmes exist within the United Kingdom (UK) to detect amblyopia, and once detected treatment is given.Existing patient reported outcome (PRO) measures for amblyopia do not meet current recommendations for the methods adopted during their development, or the way in which the instruments are administered. The overall aim of this study was to produce a self-complete PRO instrument for amblyopia for children aged 4-7 years that uses children's responses in the development phase. The study comprised a number of stages. This paper reports on the refinement of the descriptive system for the draft instrument (the Child Amblyopia Treatment Questionnaire, CAT-QoL) using qualitative and quantitative methods.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 25%
Psychology 8 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Sports and Recreations 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 14 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2013.
All research outputs
#4,613,138
of 15,442,255 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#546
of 1,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,805
of 187,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,442,255 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,660 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them