You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Attitudes toward working in rural areas of Thai medical, dental and pharmacy new graduates in 2012: a cross-sectional survey
|
---|---|
Published in |
Human Resources for Health, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1478-4491-11-53 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Noppakun Thammatacharee, Rapeepong Suphanchaimat, Thunthita Wisaijohn, Supon Limwattananon, Weerasak Putthasri |
Abstract |
Inequity in health workforce distribution has been a national concern of the Thai health service for decades. The government has launched various policies to increase the distribution of health workforces to rural areas. However, little is known regarding the attitudes of health workers and the factors influencing their decision to work in rural areas. This study aimed to explore the current attitudes of new medical, dental and pharmacy graduates as well as determine the linkage between their characteristics and the preference for working in rural areas. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 2 | 2% |
Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 86 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 15 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
Researcher | 11 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
Professor | 4 | 4% |
Other | 16 | 18% |
Unknown | 25 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 12 | 13% |
Unknown | 28 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2017.
All research outputs
#6,496,106
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#686
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,881
of 224,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#14
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.