You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Validation of an instrument to evaluate quality of life in the aging population: WHOQOL-AGE
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-11-177 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francisco Félix Caballero, Marta Miret, Mick Power, Somnath Chatterji, Beata Tobiasz-Adamczyk, Seppo Koskinen, Matilde Leonardi, Beatriz Olaya, Josep Maria Haro, José Luis Ayuso-Mateos |
| Abstract |
There is a need for short, specific instruments that assess quality of life (QOL) adequately in the older adult population. The aims of the present study were to obtain evidence on the validity of the inferences that could be drawn from an instrument to measure QOL in the aging population (people 50+ years old), and to test its psychometric properties. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 166 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 22% |
| Unknown | 30 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 25 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 19% |
| Unknown | 42 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2013.
All research outputs
#20,207,295
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,972
of 2,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,966
of 212,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.