↓ Skip to main content

Long-term efficacy of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment of breast fibroadenoma

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-term efficacy of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment of breast fibroadenoma
Published in
Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40349-017-0083-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roussanka Kovatcheva, Katja Zaletel, Jordan Vlahov, Julian Stoinov

Abstract

To assess the long term efficacy and tolerability of one or two ultrasound (US)-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment in patients with breast fibroadenoma (FA). Twenty patients with 26 FA were selected for US-guided HIFU. The therapy was performed in one or two sessions. FA volume was assessed before and followed up to 24 months after the last HIFU. After each treatment, adverse events were evaluated. In 19/26 FA (73.1%) one HIFU was performed (group 1), whereas 7/26 FA (26.9%) received second HIFU (group 2) 6-9 months (median, 7 months) after the first session. In group 1 and 2, FA volume decreased significantly at 1-month (p < 0.001) and 3-month follow-up (p = 0.005), respectively, and continued to reduce until 24-month follow-up (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). At 24 months, mean volume reduction was 77.32% in group 1 and 90.47% in group 2 (p = 0.025). Mild subcutaneous edema was observed in 4 patients and skin erythema in 3 patients. US-guided HIFU represents a promising non-invasive method with sustainable FA volume reduction and patient's tolerability. Although one treatment is highly efficient, the volume reduction can be increased with second treatment. NCT01331954. Registered 07 April 2011.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 7 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 31%
Engineering 3 12%
Mathematics 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 10 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2019.
All research outputs
#620,479
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound
#1
of 76 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,507
of 308,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 76 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them