↓ Skip to main content

International developments in revenues and incomes of general practitioners from 2000 to 2010

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
International developments in revenues and incomes of general practitioners from 2000 to 2010
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-436
Pubmed ID
Authors

Madelon Kroneman, Pascal Meeus, Dionne Sofia Kringos, Wim Groot, Jouke van der Zee

Abstract

The remuneration system of General Practitioners (GPs) has changed in several countries in the past decade. The aim of our study was: to establish the effect of these changes on the revenues and income of GPs in the first decade of the 21st century.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 50 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 25%
Student > Master 9 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Librarian 2 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 34%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 8%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 16 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2013.
All research outputs
#14,027,062
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,791
of 7,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,851
of 214,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#80
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.