You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Depression treatment and short-term healthcare expenditures among elderly Medicare beneficiaries with chronic physical conditions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1477-5751-12-15 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chan Shen, Neel Shah, Patricia A Findley, Usha Sambamoorthi |
Abstract |
Research on the impact of depression treatment on expenditures is nascent and shows results that vary from negative associations with healthcare expenditures to increased expenditures. However many of these studies did not include psychotherapy as part of the depression treatment. None of these studies included "no treatment" as a comparison group. In addition, no study has included a broad group of chronic physical conditions in studying depression treatment expenditures. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 67% |
United Arab Emirates | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 21% |
Researcher | 4 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 18% |
Unknown | 5 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 36% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 14% |
Psychology | 3 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2013.
All research outputs
#14,764,029
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine
#59
of 112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,798
of 212,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.