↓ Skip to main content

Antagonistic effect of alkaloids and saponins on bioactivity in the quinine tree (Rauvolfia caffra sond.): further evidence to support biotechnology in traditional medicinal plants

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antagonistic effect of alkaloids and saponins on bioactivity in the quinine tree (Rauvolfia caffra sond.): further evidence to support biotechnology in traditional medicinal plants
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-13-285
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trizah K Milugo, Leonida K Omosa, James O Ochanda, Bethwell O Owuor, Fred A Wamunyokoli, Julius O Oyugi, Joel W Ochieng

Abstract

The Quinine tree (Rauvolfia caffra) is used as a medicinal plant among traditional communities in many countries to manage tumors and other diseases associated with oxidative stress. To validate indigenous knowledge and possibly position this herb for technology uptake and utilization, we established the level of antioxidant activity in R. caffra, and probed for the presence of associated phytochemicals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 132 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 19%
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Student > Master 14 11%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 39 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 22%
Chemistry 15 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 42 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2013.
All research outputs
#14,180,180
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,678
of 3,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,882
of 212,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#60
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.