↓ Skip to main content

Client-provider interactions in provider-initiated and voluntary HIV counseling and testing services in Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Client-provider interactions in provider-initiated and voluntary HIV counseling and testing services in Uganda
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-423
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rhoda K Wanyenze, David Kyaddondo, John Kinsman, Fredrick Makumbi, Robert Colebunders, Anita Hardon

Abstract

Provider-initiated HIV testing and counselling (PITC) is based on information-giving while voluntary counselling and testing (VCT) includes individualised client-centered counseling. It is not known if the provider-client experiences, perceptions and client satisfaction with the information provided differs in the two approaches.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Botswana 1 1%
Kenya 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 67 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Researcher 5 7%
Lecturer 4 6%
Other 16 23%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 33%
Social Sciences 15 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Psychology 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 10 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2013.
All research outputs
#2,898,235
of 3,634,361 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,491
of 1,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,940
of 95,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#109
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,634,361 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,753 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.