You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Human well-being impacts of terrestrial protected areas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2047-2382-2-19 |
| Authors |
Andrew S Pullin, Mukdarut Bangpan, Sarah Dalrymple, Kelly Dickson, Neal R Haddaway, John R Healey, Hanan Hauari, Neal Hockley, Julia P G Jones, Teri Knight, Carol Vigurs, Sandy Oliver |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 35% |
| Chile | 2 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Thailand | 1 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 58% |
| Scientists | 12 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 454 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 2% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Belize | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 432 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 87 | 19% |
| Researcher | 76 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 69 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 5% |
| Other | 76 | 17% |
| Unknown | 83 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 140 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 76 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 56 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 23 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 43 | 9% |
| Unknown | 103 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,550,697
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#52
of 334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,019
of 226,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them