↓ Skip to main content

Beyond antimalarial stock-outs: implications of health provider compliance on out-of-pocket expenditure during care-seeking for fever in South East Tanzania

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Beyond antimalarial stock-outs: implications of health provider compliance on out-of-pocket expenditure during care-seeking for fever in South East Tanzania
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-444
Pubmed ID
Authors

Inez Mikkelsen-Lopez, Fabrizio Tediosi, Gumi Abdallah, Mustafa Njozi, Baraka Amuri, Rashid Khatib, Fatuma Manzi, Don de Savigny

Abstract

To better understand how stock-outs of the first line antimalarial, Artemisinin-based Combination Therapy (ACT) and other non-compliant health worker behaviour, influence household expenditures during care-seeking for fever in the Ulanga District in Tanzania.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 102 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 30%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 21 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 15%
Social Sciences 12 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 6%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 24 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2013.
All research outputs
#14,180,180
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,049
of 7,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,080
of 212,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#95
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.