↓ Skip to main content

HIV-1 tropism: a comparison between RNA and proviral DNA in routine clinical samples from Chilean patients

Overview of attention for article published in Virology Journal, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HIV-1 tropism: a comparison between RNA and proviral DNA in routine clinical samples from Chilean patients
Published in
Virology Journal, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1743-422x-10-318
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pablo Ferrer, Luisa Montecinos, Mario Tello, Rocio Tordecilla, Consuelo Rodríguez, Marcela Ferrés, Carlos M Pérez, Carlos Beltrán, Maria A Guzmán, Alejandro Afani

Abstract

HIV in Chile has a notification rate of 0.01%. Coreceptor antagonists are a family of antiretroviral drugs that are used with the prior knowledge of patients HIV-1 tropism. Viral RNA-based tropism detection requires a plasma viral load ≥1000 copies/mL, while proviral DNA-based detection can be performed regardless of plasma viral load. This test is useful in patients with low or undetectable viral loads and would benefit with a proper therapy. The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between HIV RNA and proviral genotypic DNA tropism tests.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 36%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Librarian 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2013.
All research outputs
#13,899,800
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#1,470
of 3,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,527
of 212,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#36
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.