You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Social cohesion matters in health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal for Equity in Health, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-9276-12-87 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ying-Chih Chuang, Kun-Yang Chuang, Tzu-Hsuan Yang |
| Abstract |
The concept of social cohesion has invoked debate due to the vagueness of its definition and the limitations of current measurements. This paper attempts to examine the concept of social cohesion, develop measurements, and investigate the relationship between social cohesion and individual health. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 15% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 192 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
| Researcher | 20 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 19% |
| Unknown | 42 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 35 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 10% |
| Psychology | 13 | 7% |
| Design | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 18% |
| Unknown | 47 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2021.
All research outputs
#616,882
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#57
of 2,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,202
of 225,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.