You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Participant experiences of an internet-based intervention and randomised control trial: interview study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1017 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Todkill, John Powell |
| Abstract |
There are an increasing number of interventions being delivered online, and an expanding body of research to assess the effectiveness of such interventions. Yet, little is known about the motivations for participating in online research. Furthermore, internet interventions and online research studies are characterised by poor adherence and high attrition rates. This study aimed to explore participant motivations for taking part in an online trial of an internet intervention and the reasons for continuing. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 3 | 33% |
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Ireland | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 139 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 33 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 37 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 41 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2014.
All research outputs
#6,507,803
of 24,764,450 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,764
of 16,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,779
of 219,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#124
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,764,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.