You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Osteogenesis evaluation of duck’s feet-derived collagen/hydroxyapatite sponges immersed in dexamethasone
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biomaterials Research, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40824-017-0088-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yeon Ji Kook, Dae Hoon Lee, Jeong Eun Song, Nirmalya Tripathy, Yoo Shin Jeon, Ha Yan Jeon, Joaquim M. Oliveira, Rui L. Reis, Gilson Khang |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to investigate the osteogenesis effects of DC and DC/HAp sponge immersed in without and with dexamethasone. The experimental groups in this study were DC and DC/HAp sponge immersed in without dexamethasone (Dex(-)DC and Dex(-)-DC/HAp group) and with dexamethasone (Dex(+)-DC and Dex(+)-DC/HAp group). We characterized DC and DC/HAp sponge using compressive strength, scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Also, osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs on sponge (Dex(-)DC, Dex(-)-DC/HAp, Dex(+)-DC and Dex(+)-DC/HAp group) was assessed by SEM, 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazoliumbromide (MTT) assay, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity assay and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). In this study, we assessed osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs on Duck's feet-derived collagen (DC)/HAp sponge immersed with dexamethasone Dex(+)-DC/HAp. These results showed that Dex(+)-DC/HAp group increased cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs during 28 days. From these results, Dex(+)-DC/HAp can be envisioned as a potential biomaterial for bone regeneration applications. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 33% |
| Researcher | 4 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 4 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 14% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2017.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Biomaterials Research
#142
of 197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,914
of 324,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomaterials Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them