You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Modeling precision treatment of breast cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r110 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anneleen Daemen, Obi L Griffith, Laura M Heiser, Nicholas J Wang, Oana M Enache, Zachary Sanborn, Francois Pepin, Steffen Durinck, James E Korkola, Malachi Griffith, Joe S Hur, Nam Huh, Jongsuk Chung, Leslie Cope, Mary Fackler, Christopher Umbricht, Saraswati Sukumar, Pankaj Seth, Vikas P Sukhatme, Lakshmi R Jakkula, Yiling Lu, Gordon B Mills, Raymond J Cho, Eric A Collisson, Laura J van’t Veer, Paul T Spellman, Joe W Gray |
| Abstract |
First-generation molecular profiles for human breast cancers have enabled the identification of features that can predict therapeutic response; however, little is known about how the various data types can best be combined to yield optimal predictors. Collections of breast cancer cell lines mirror many aspects of breast cancer molecular pathobiology, and measurements of their omic and biological therapeutic responses are well-suited for development of strategies to identify the most predictive molecular feature sets. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 33% |
| Germany | 2 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Serbia | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Bahrain | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 16 | 76% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 317 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 99 | 28% |
| Researcher | 83 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 55 | 16% |
| Unknown | 31 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 107 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 84 | 24% |
| Computer Science | 41 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 9% |
| Engineering | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 7% |
| Unknown | 46 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,506,942
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,275
of 4,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,909
of 287,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#54
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.