↓ Skip to main content

ACPYPE - AnteChamber PYthon Parser interfacE

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1944 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1072 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ACPYPE - AnteChamber PYthon Parser interfacE
Published in
BMC Research Notes, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-5-367
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan W Sousa da Silva, Wim F Vranken

Abstract

ACPYPE (or AnteChamber PYthon Parser interfacE) is a wrapper script around the ANTECHAMBER software that simplifies the generation of small molecule topologies and parameters for a variety of molecular dynamics programmes like GROMACS, CHARMM and CNS. It is written in the Python programming language and was developed as a tool for interfacing with other Python based applications such as the CCPN software suite (for NMR data analysis) and ARIA (for structure calculations from NMR data). ACPYPE is open source code, under GNU GPL v3, and is available as a stand-alone application at http://www.ccpn.ac.uk/acpype and as a web portal application at http://webapps.ccpn.ac.uk/acpype.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,072 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 4 <1%
Italy 4 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 10 <1%
Unknown 1036 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 226 21%
Researcher 172 16%
Student > Master 143 13%
Student > Bachelor 95 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 59 6%
Other 129 12%
Unknown 248 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 274 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 156 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 100 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 41 4%
Engineering 36 3%
Other 160 15%
Unknown 305 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,891,936
of 23,570,677 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#547
of 4,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,287
of 165,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#20
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,570,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.