You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Potency preservation following stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiation Oncology, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-717x-8-256 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Olusola Obayomi-Davies, Leonard N Chen, Aditi Bhagat, Henry C Wright, Sunghae Uhm, Joy S Kim, Thomas M Yung, Siyuan Lei, Gerald P Batipps, John Pahira, Kevin G McGeagh, Brian T Collins, Keith Kowalczyk, Gaurav Bandi, Deepak Kumar, Simeng Suy, Anatoly Dritschilo, John H Lynch, Sean P Collins |
| Abstract |
Erectile dysfunction after prostate radiation therapy remains an ongoing challenge and critical quality of life issue. Given the higher dose of radiation per fraction using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) there is concern that post-SBRT impotency would be higher than conventional radiation therapy approaches. This study sought to evaluate potency preservation and sexual function following SBRT for prostate cancer. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Singapore | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 14% |
| Researcher | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2020.
All research outputs
#6,347,893
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#294
of 2,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,898
of 213,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#9
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,046 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.