↓ Skip to main content

Potency preservation following stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Potency preservation following stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer
Published in
Radiation Oncology, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1748-717x-8-256
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olusola Obayomi-Davies, Leonard N Chen, Aditi Bhagat, Henry C Wright, Sunghae Uhm, Joy S Kim, Thomas M Yung, Siyuan Lei, Gerald P Batipps, John Pahira, Kevin G McGeagh, Brian T Collins, Keith Kowalczyk, Gaurav Bandi, Deepak Kumar, Simeng Suy, Anatoly Dritschilo, John H Lynch, Sean P Collins

Abstract

Erectile dysfunction after prostate radiation therapy remains an ongoing challenge and critical quality of life issue. Given the higher dose of radiation per fraction using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) there is concern that post-SBRT impotency would be higher than conventional radiation therapy approaches. This study sought to evaluate potency preservation and sexual function following SBRT for prostate cancer.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 54 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 14 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2020.
All research outputs
#5,912,813
of 21,352,585 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#274
of 1,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,616
of 210,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#27
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,352,585 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,948 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.