You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Feasibility and safety of whole-body vibration therapy in intensive care patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, April 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-017-1669-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Peter Alter, Tobias Boeselt, Christoph Nell, Marc Spielmanns, Klaus Kenn, A. Rembert Koczulla |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 1 | 20% |
Russia | 1 | 20% |
Colombia | 1 | 20% |
Canada | 1 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 23% |
Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
Professor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 15% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 15% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2017.
All research outputs
#13,312,402
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,486
of 6,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,570
of 310,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#58
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,079 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.