↓ Skip to main content

Molecular subtypes in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast and their relation to prognosis: a population-based cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular subtypes in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast and their relation to prognosis: a population-based cohort study
Published in
BMC Cancer, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-13-512
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wenjing Zhou, Karin Jirström, Rose-Marie Amini, Marie-Louise Fjällskog, Thomas Sollie, Henrik Lindman, Therese Sørlie, Carl Blomqvist, Fredrik Wärnberg

Abstract

Different molecular subtypes of breast cancer have been identified based on gene expression profiling. Treatment suggestions based on an approximation of these subtypes by immunohistochemical criteria have been published by the St Gallen international expert consensus panel. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) can be classified into the same molecular subtypes. Our aim was to study the relation between these newly defined subtypes and prognosis in DCIS.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 78 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Student > Master 10 13%
Other 8 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Other 20 25%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Unspecified 3 4%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 14 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2013.
All research outputs
#9,118,251
of 16,578,610 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,075
of 6,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,462
of 192,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#137
of 361 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,578,610 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,083 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 361 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.