You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Outreach for chlamydia and gonorrhoea screening: a systematic review of strategies and outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1040 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Belinda Hengel, Muhammad S Jamil, Jacqueline K Mein, Lisa Maher, John M Kaldor, Rebecca J Guy |
| Abstract |
High Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) prevalence have been reported in populations that do not regularly access health centres for sexually transmissible infections (STI) testing. We reviewed current outreach strategies used to increase access to STI testing and their outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Singapore | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 17% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 119 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 34 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 41 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2013.
All research outputs
#13,160,598
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,099
of 15,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,901
of 215,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#177
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.