↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of methods for amino acid matrix selection and their use on empirical data shows that ad hoc assumptions for choice of matrix are not justified

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
947 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
421 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of methods for amino acid matrix selection and their use on empirical data shows that ad hoc assumptions for choice of matrix are not justified
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, March 2006
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-6-29
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas M Keane, Christopher J Creevey, Melissa M Pentony, Thomas J Naughton, James O Mclnerney

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 421 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 2%
United States 6 1%
Germany 5 1%
Spain 5 1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Uruguay 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Other 21 5%
Unknown 366 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 122 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 110 26%
Student > Master 47 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 5%
Other 63 15%
Unknown 34 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 259 62%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 63 15%
Computer Science 15 4%
Environmental Science 12 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 2%
Other 19 5%
Unknown 45 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2022.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#2,076
of 3,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,058
of 89,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.