↓ Skip to main content

Caffeine enhances upper body strength in resistance-trained women

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
5 Facebook pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Caffeine enhances upper body strength in resistance-trained women
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/1550-2783-7-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erica Goldstein, Patrick L Jacobs, Michael Whitehurst, Tina Penhollow, Jose Antonio

Abstract

Research has indicated that low-to-moderate dosages of caffeine supplementation are ergogenic for sustained endurance efforts as well as high-intensity exercise. The effects of caffeine supplementation on strength-power performance are equivocal, with some studies indicating a benefit and others demonstrating no change in performance. The majority of research that has examined the effects of caffeine supplementation on strength-power performance has been carried out in both trained and untrained men. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the acute effects of caffeine supplementation on strength and muscular endurance in resistance-trained women.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 204 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 51 25%
Student > Master 45 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Researcher 9 4%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 35 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 90 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 47 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2021.
All research outputs
#337,066
of 20,163,854 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#114
of 844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,401
of 209,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#13
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,163,854 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.