Xiuzhen Huang, Barry Bruce, Alison Buchan, Clare Bates Congdon, Carole L Cramer, Steven F Jennings, Hongmei Jiang, Zenglu Li, Gail McClure, Rick McMullen, Jason H Moore, Bindu Nanduri, Joan Peckham, Andy Perkins, Shawn W Polson, Bhanu Rekepalli, Saeed Salem, Jennifer Specker, Donald Wunsch, Donghai Xiong, Shuzhong Zhang, Zhongming Zhao
Abstract
Currently there are definitions from many agencies and research societies defining "bioinformatics" as deriving knowledge from computational analysis of large volumes of biological and biomedical data. Should this be the bioinformatics research focus? We will discuss this issue in this review article. We would like to promote the idea of supporting human-infrastructure (HI) with no-boundary thinking (NT) in bioinformatics (HINT).
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,195,846
of 26,586,231 outputs
Outputs from BioData Mining
#54
of 327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,992
of 230,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioData Mining
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,586,231 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.
