↓ Skip to main content

Effect of spaceflight on Pseudomonas aeruginosa final cell density is modulated by nutrient and oxygen availability

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 3,393)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
17 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of spaceflight on Pseudomonas aeruginosa final cell density is modulated by nutrient and oxygen availability
Published in
BMC Microbiology, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2180-13-241
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wooseong Kim, Farah K Tengra, Jasmine Shong, Nicholas Marchand, Hon Kit Chan, Zachary Young, Ravindra C Pangule, Macarena Parra, Jonathan S Dordick, Joel L Plawsky, Cynthia H Collins

Abstract

Abundant populations of bacteria have been observed on Mir and the International Space Station. While some experiments have shown that bacteria cultured during spaceflight exhibit a range of potentially troublesome characteristics, including increases in growth, antibiotic resistance and virulence, other studies have shown minimal differences when cells were cultured during spaceflight or on Earth. Although the final cell density of bacteria grown during spaceflight has been reported for several species, we are not yet able to predict how different microorganisms will respond to the microgravity environment. In order to build our understanding of how spaceflight affects bacterial final cell densities, additional studies are needed to determine whether the observed differences are due to varied methods, experimental conditions, or organism specific responses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 21%
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 19 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 16%
Engineering 10 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 7%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 23 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2019.
All research outputs
#650,171
of 24,652,007 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#20
of 3,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,711
of 221,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,652,007 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,393 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.