↓ Skip to main content

Factors influencing health-related quality of life after total hip replacement - a comparison of data from the Swedish and Danish hip arthroplasty registers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors influencing health-related quality of life after total hip replacement - a comparison of data from the Swedish and Danish hip arthroplasty registers
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-316
Pubmed ID
Authors

Max Gordon, Aksel Paulsen, Søren Overgaard, Göran Garellick, Alma B Pedersen, Ola Rolfson

Abstract

There is an increasing focus on measuring patient-reported outcomes (PROs) as part of routine medical practice, particularly in fields such as joint replacement surgery where pain relief and improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are primary outcomes. Between-country comparisons of PROs may present difficulties due to cultural differences and differences in the provision of health care. However, in order to understand how these differences affect PROs, common predictors for poor and good outcomes need to be investigated. This cross-sectional study investigates factors influencing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) one year after total hip replacement (THR) surgery in Sweden and in Denmark.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 66 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 13%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Psychology 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 22 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2013.
All research outputs
#2,452,512
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#496
of 4,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,423
of 215,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.