↓ Skip to main content

Combined effect of branched-chain amino acids and taurine supplementation on delayed onset muscle soreness and muscle damage in high-intensity eccentric exercise

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
58 X users
facebook
18 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combined effect of branched-chain amino acids and taurine supplementation on delayed onset muscle soreness and muscle damage in high-intensity eccentric exercise
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
DOI 10.1186/1550-2783-10-51
Pubmed ID
Authors

Song-Gyu Ra, Teruo Miyazaki, Keisuke Ishikura, Hisashi Nagayama, Shoichi Komine, Yoshio Nakata, Seiji Maeda, Yasushi Matsuzaki, Hajime Ohmori

Abstract

Previous studies have evaluated the effectiveness of branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) supplementation for preventing delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) and muscle damage induced by eccentric exercise, their findings have been inconclusive. Since taurine has anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative effects, the present study investigated the combined effect of BCAA and taurine on DOMS and muscle damage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 241 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 21%
Student > Bachelor 50 20%
Student > Postgraduate 24 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 8%
Researcher 17 7%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 50 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 71 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 62 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2023.
All research outputs
#540,555
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#164
of 950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,322
of 449,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#155
of 852 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 852 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.