You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome sequence of Xanthomonas fuscans subsp. fuscansstrain 4834-R reveals that flagellar motility is not a general feature of xanthomonads
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-14-761 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Armelle Darrasse, Sébastien Carrère, Valérie Barbe, Tristan Boureau, Mario L Arrieta-Ortiz, Sophie Bonneau, Martial Briand, Chrystelle Brin, Stéphane Cociancich, Karine Durand, Stéphanie Fouteau, Lionel Gagnevin, Fabien Guérin, Endrick Guy, Arnaud Indiana, Ralf Koebnik, Emmanuelle Lauber, Alejandra Munoz, Laurent D Noël, Isabelle Pieretti, Stéphane Poussier, Olivier Pruvost, Isabelle Robène-Soustrade, Philippe Rott, Monique Royer, Laurana Serres-Giardi, Boris Szurek, Marie-Anne van Sluys, Valérie Verdier, Christian Vernière, Matthieu Arlat, Charles Manceau, Marie-Agnès Jacques |
| Abstract |
Xanthomonads are plant-associated bacteria responsible for diseases on economically important crops. Xanthomonas fuscans subsp. fuscans (Xff) is one of the causal agents of common bacterial blight of bean. In this study, the complete genome sequence of strain Xff 4834-R was determined and compared to other Xanthomonas genome sequences. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 102 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 19% |
| Unknown | 20 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 55% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2013.
All research outputs
#16,048,159
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#6,833
of 10,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,899
of 218,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#79
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,793 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.