You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Production and validation of a good manufacturing practice grade human fibroblast line for supporting human embryonic stem cell derivation and culture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/scrt103 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nilendran Prathalingam, Linda Ferguson, Lesley Young, Georg Lietz, Rachel Oldershaw, Lyn Healy, Albert Craig, Helen Lister, Rakesh Binaykia, Radhika Sheth, Alison Murdoch, Mary Herbert |
| Abstract |
The development of reproducible methods for deriving human embryonic stem cell (hESC) lines in compliance with good manufacturing practice (GMP) is essential for the development of hESC-based therapies. Although significant progress has been made toward the development of chemically defined conditions for the maintenance and differentiation of hESCs, efficient derivation of new hESCs requires the use of fibroblast feeder cells. However, GMP-grade feeder cell lines validated for hESC derivation are not readily available. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 43 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 38% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 8 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 36% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 11% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,530,947
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#304
of 2,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,289
of 160,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.