You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The effects of linkage on comparative estimators of selection
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, November 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-13-244 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Carmen HS Chan, Steven Hamblin, Mark M Tanaka |
Abstract |
A major goal of molecular evolution is to determine how natural selection has shaped the evolution of a gene. One approach taken by methods such as KA/KS and the McDonald-Kreitman (MK) test is to compare the frequency of non-synonymous and synonymous changes. These methods, however, rely on the assumption that a change in frequency of one mutation will not affect changes in frequency of other mutations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 6% |
Sweden | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 28 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 32% |
Researcher | 9 | 29% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
Professor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 2 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 55% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 13% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 6% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2013.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#3,267
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,316
of 228,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#59
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.