↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic indicators of non-cardiovascular chest pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnostic indicators of non-cardiovascular chest pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Medicine, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-11-239
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria M Wertli, Katrin B Ruchti, Johann Steurer, Ulrike Held

Abstract

Non-cardiovascular chest pain (NCCP) has a high healthcare cost, but insufficient guidelines exist for its diagnostic investigation. The objective of the present work was to identify important diagnostic indicators and their accuracy for specific and non-specific conditions underlying NCCP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 92 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 19%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 23 24%
Unknown 18 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Psychology 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 22 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2022.
All research outputs
#5,977,649
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,308
of 3,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,512
of 216,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#48
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.