↓ Skip to main content

Genomics Research: World Survey of Public Funding

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genomics Research: World Survey of Public Funding
Published in
BMC Genomics, October 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-9-472
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Reineke Pohlhaus, Robert M Cook-Deegan

Abstract

Over the past two decades, genomics has evolved as a scientific research discipline. Genomics research was fueled initially by government and nonprofit funding sources, later augmented by private research and development (R&D) funding. Citizens and taxpayers of many countries have funded much of the research, and have expectations about access to the resulting information and knowledge. While access to knowledge gained from all publicly funded research is desired, access is especially important for fields that have broad social impact and stimulate public dialogue. Genomics is one such field, where public concerns are raised for reasons such as health care and insurance implications, as well as personal and ancestral identification. Thus, genomics has grown rapidly as a field, and attracts considerable interest.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Brazil 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Romania 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 77 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 22%
Student > Master 11 13%
Other 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 11 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 31%
Social Sciences 11 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 12 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,321,284
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#224
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,157
of 102,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#1
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.