You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Wnt signaling in triple negative breast cancer is associated with metastasis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-13-537 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nandini Dey, Benjamin G Barwick, Carlos S Moreno, Maja Ordanic-Kodani, Zhengjia Chen, Gabriella Oprea-Ilies, Weining Tang, Charles Catzavelos, Kimberly F Kerstann, George W Sledge, Mark Abramovitz, Mark Bouzyk, Pradip De, Brian R Leyland-Jones |
| Abstract |
Triple Negative subset of (TN) Breast Cancers (BC), a close associate of the basal-like subtype (with limited discordance) is an aggressive form of the disease which convey unpredictable, and poor prognosis due to limited treatment options and lack of proven effective targeted therapies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| India | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 208 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 17% |
| Researcher | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 16% |
| Unknown | 44 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 60 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 16% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 5% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 48 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2013.
All research outputs
#6,782,242
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#1,722
of 8,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,235
of 216,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#18
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,483 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.