↓ Skip to main content

The effect of giving influenza vaccination to general practitioners: a controlled trial [NCT00221676]

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of giving influenza vaccination to general practitioners: a controlled trial [NCT00221676]
Published in
BMC Medicine, July 2006
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-4-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michiels Barbara, Philips Hilde, Coenen Samuel, Yane Fernande, Steinhauser Toon, Stuyck Sofie, Denekens Joke, Van Royen Paul

Abstract

No efficacy studies of influenza vaccination given to GPs have yet been published. Therefore, our purpose was to assess the effect of an inactivated influenza vaccine given to GPs on the rate of clinical respiratory tract infections (RTIs) and proven influenza cases (influenza positive nose and throat swabs and a 4-fold titre rise), while adjusting for important covariates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 27%
Student > Bachelor 8 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Other 2 5%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 8 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2013.
All research outputs
#18,353,475
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#3,185
of 3,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,649
of 65,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.5. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.