↓ Skip to main content

Effects of coenzyme Q10 supplementation (300 mg/day) on antioxidation and anti-inflammation in coronary artery disease patients during statins therapy: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
18 X users
facebook
10 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of coenzyme Q10 supplementation (300 mg/day) on antioxidation and anti-inflammation in coronary artery disease patients during statins therapy: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial
Published in
Nutrition Journal, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-12-142
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bor-Jen Lee, Yu-Fen Tseng, Chi-Hua Yen, Ping-Ting Lin

Abstract

High oxidative stress and chronic inflammation can contribute to the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease (CAD). Coenzyme Q10 is an endogenous lipid-soluble antioxidant. Statins therapy can reduce the biosynthesis of coenzyme Q10. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a coenzyme Q10 supplement (300 mg/d; 150 mg/b.i.d) on antioxidation and anti-inflammation in patients who have CAD during statins therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 244 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 67 27%
Student > Master 38 15%
Researcher 17 7%
Other 16 6%
Student > Postgraduate 16 6%
Other 45 18%
Unknown 48 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 4%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 59 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,402,673
of 25,067,172 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#375
of 1,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,893
of 222,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#12
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,067,172 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.