↓ Skip to main content

Chlamydia prevalence in the general population: is there a sex difference? a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chlamydia prevalence in the general population: is there a sex difference? a systematic review
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-13-534
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick W Dielissen, Doreth AM Teunissen, Antoine LM Lagro-Janssen

Abstract

The focus of Chlamydia trachomatis screening and testing lies more on women than on men. The study aim was to establish by systematic review the prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in men and women in the general population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 92 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 22%
Student > Master 15 16%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 6 6%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 9%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 23 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2023.
All research outputs
#13,840,040
of 24,174,783 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3,243
of 8,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,103
of 218,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#43
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,174,783 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.