You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Chlamydia prevalence in the general population: is there a sex difference? a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-13-534 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Patrick W Dielissen, Doreth AM Teunissen, Antoine LM Lagro-Janssen |
Abstract |
The focus of Chlamydia trachomatis screening and testing lies more on women than on men. The study aim was to establish by systematic review the prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in men and women in the general population. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 92 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 22% |
Student > Master | 15 | 16% |
Researcher | 13 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 13% |
Unknown | 19 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
Other | 13 | 14% |
Unknown | 23 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2023.
All research outputs
#13,840,040
of 24,174,783 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3,243
of 8,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,103
of 218,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#43
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,174,783 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.