You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Non-invasive ventilation for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: intubation rate and risk factors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc13103 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arnaud W Thille, Damien Contou, Chiara Fragnoli, Ana Córdoba-Izquierdo, Florence Boissier, Christian Brun-Buisson |
| Abstract |
We assessed rates and predictive factors of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) failure in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for non-hypercapnic acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 38% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 13% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 200 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 13% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 51 | 24% |
| Unknown | 56 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 110 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 8% |
| Engineering | 7 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 66 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,861,560
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,664
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,959
of 225,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#6
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.