↓ Skip to main content

Screening for pregestational and gestational diabetes in pregnancy: a survey of obstetrical centers in the northern part of Belgium

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Screening for pregestational and gestational diabetes in pregnancy: a survey of obstetrical centers in the northern part of Belgium
Published in
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1758-5996-5-66
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katrien Benhalima, Paul Van Crombrugge, Roland Devlieger, Johan Verhaeghe, Ann Verhaegen, Luc De Catte, Chantal Mathieu

Abstract

There is lack of consensus concerning the best screening strategy for gestational diabetes (GDM). The aim of our survey was therefore to investigate attitudes and practices of all obstetrical centers in the northern part of Belgium regarding screening for pregestational diabetes in early pregnancy and screening for GDM. We also aimed to identify the penetrance of the 'International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Groups' (IADPSG) screening strategy for GDM.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 32%
Other 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 18%
Lecturer 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 5 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2013.
All research outputs
#3,065,736
of 4,507,509 outputs
Outputs from Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
#140
of 203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,242
of 102,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
#12
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,507,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 203 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.