You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Screening for pregestational and gestational diabetes in pregnancy: a survey of obstetrical centers in the northern part of Belgium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1758-5996-5-66 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katrien Benhalima, Paul Van Crombrugge, Roland Devlieger, Johan Verhaeghe, Ann Verhaegen, Luc De Catte, Chantal Mathieu |
| Abstract |
There is lack of consensus concerning the best screening strategy for gestational diabetes (GDM). The aim of our survey was therefore to investigate attitudes and practices of all obstetrical centers in the northern part of Belgium regarding screening for pregestational diabetes in early pregnancy and screening for GDM. We also aimed to identify the penetrance of the 'International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Groups' (IADPSG) screening strategy for GDM. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 30% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 16% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2013.
All research outputs
#18,353,475
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
#462
of 661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,364
of 212,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.