You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fast reproducible identification and large-scale databasing of individual functional cognitive networks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neuroscience, October 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2202-8-91 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philippe Pinel, Bertrand Thirion, Sébastien Meriaux, Antoinette Jobert, Julien Serres, Denis Le Bihan, Jean-Baptiste Poline, Stanislas Dehaene |
| Abstract |
Although cognitive processes such as reading and calculation are associated with reproducible cerebral networks, inter-individual variability is considerable. Understanding the origins of this variability will require the elaboration of large multimodal databases compiling behavioral, anatomical, genetic and functional neuroimaging data over hundreds of subjects. With this goal in mind, we designed a simple and fast acquisition procedure based on a 5-minute functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) sequence that can be run as easily and as systematically as an anatomical scan, and is therefore used in every subject undergoing fMRI in our laboratory. This protocol captures the cerebral bases of auditory and visual perception, motor actions, reading, language comprehension and mental calculation at an individual level. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 6 | 3% |
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Cuba | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 194 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 57 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 12% |
| Professor | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 15% |
| Unknown | 28 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 62 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 29 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 10% |
| Engineering | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 12% |
| Unknown | 41 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,821,282
of 25,177,382 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#91
of 1,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,816
of 84,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,177,382 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,288 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.