↓ Skip to main content

The impact of body temperature abnormalities on the disease severity and outcome in patients with severe sepsis: an analysis from a multicenter, prospective survey of severe sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
15 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of body temperature abnormalities on the disease severity and outcome in patients with severe sepsis: an analysis from a multicenter, prospective survey of severe sepsis
Published in
Critical Care, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/cc13106
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shigeki Kushimoto, Satoshi Gando, Daizoh Saitoh, Toshihiko Mayumi, Hiroshi Ogura, Seitaro Fujishima, Tsunetoshi Araki, Hiroto Ikeda, Joji Kotani, Yasuo Miki, Shin-ichiro Shiraishi, Koichiro Suzuki, Yasushi Suzuki, Naoshi Takeyama, Kiyotsugu Takuma, Ryosuke Tsuruta, Yoshihiro Yamaguchi, Norio Yamashita, Naoki Aikawa

Abstract

Abnormal body temperatures (Tb) are frequently seen in patients with severe sepsis. However, the relationship between Tb abnormalities and the severity of disease is not clear. This study investigated the impact of Tb on disease severity and outcomes in patients with severe sepsis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 124 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Student > Master 14 11%
Other 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Other 28 22%
Unknown 20 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 61%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 22 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,376,741
of 21,353,728 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,038
of 5,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,643
of 209,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#6
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,353,728 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.