You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical characteristics of patients with spinocerebellar ataxias 1, 2, 3 and 6 in the US; a prospective observational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1750-1172-8-177 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tetsuo Ashizawa, Karla P Figueroa, Susan L Perlman, Christopher M Gomez, George R Wilmot, Jeremy D Schmahmann, Sarah H Ying, Theresa A Zesiewicz, Henry L Paulson, Vikram G Shakkottai, Khalaf O Bushara, Sheng-Han Kuo, Michael D Geschwind, Guangbin Xia, Pietro Mazzoni, Jeffrey P Krischer, David Cuthbertson, Amy Holbert, John H Ferguson, Stefan M Pulst, SH Subramony |
| Abstract |
All spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs) are rare diseases. SCA1, 2, 3 and 6 are the four most common SCAs, all caused by expanded polyglutamine-coding CAG repeats. Their pathomechanisms are becoming increasingly clear and well-designed clinical trials will be needed. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 40% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Mexico | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 17 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 25% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2020.
All research outputs
#4,119,523
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#552
of 2,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,418
of 283,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#19
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.