↓ Skip to main content

P02.18. Clinically meaningful differences in pain and disability after cupping treatment for chronic neck pain: reanalysis of 4 randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
P02.18. Clinically meaningful differences in pain and disability after cupping treatment for chronic neck pain: reanalysis of 4 randomized controlled trials
Published in
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-12-s1-p74
Authors

R Lauche, G Dobos, H Cramer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 22%
Lecturer 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2016.
All research outputs
#2,896,272
of 17,968,541 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
#563
of 2,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,925
of 196,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
#55
of 309 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,968,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 309 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.