↓ Skip to main content

Whole genome resequencing in tomato reveals variation associated with introgression and breeding events

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Whole genome resequencing in tomato reveals variation associated with introgression and breeding events
Published in
BMC Genomics, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-14-791
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mathilde Causse, Nelly Desplat, Laura Pascual, Marie-Christine Le Paslier, Christopher Sauvage, Guillaume Bauchet, Aurélie Bérard, Rémi Bounon, Maria Tchoumakov, Dominique Brunel, Jean-Paul Bouchet

Abstract

One of the goals of genomics is to identify the genetic loci responsible for variation in phenotypic traits. The completion of the tomato genome sequence and recent advances in DNA sequencing technology allow for in-depth characterization of genetic variation present in the tomato genome. Like many self-pollinated crops, cultivated tomato accessions show a low molecular but high phenotypic diversity. Here we describe the whole-genome resequencing of eight accessions (four cherry-type and four large fruited lines) chosen to represent a large range of intra-specific variability and the identification and annotation of novel polymorphisms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 1%
Italy 3 1%
France 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 204 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 25%
Researcher 51 23%
Student > Master 33 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Student > Bachelor 8 4%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 35 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 135 62%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 14%
Environmental Science 2 <1%
Chemistry 2 <1%
Computer Science 2 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 42 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,576,986
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#289
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,257
of 224,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#5
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.